Delivered-To:
<snipped>Received: by 10.70.51.10 with SMTP id g10csp652426pdo;
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:54:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.66.66.203 with SMTP id h11mr22061616pat.131.1422140040994;
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:54:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (aso-006-i424.relay.mailchannels.net. [174.136.13.70])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pt9si6443577pbc.136.2015.01.24.14.53.59
for
<snipped>;
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:54:00 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.136.13.70 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of
[email protected]) client-ip=174.136.13.70;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 174.136.13.70 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of
[email protected])
[email protected];
dkim=pass
[email protected];
dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com
X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|98.139.213.163
Received: from r8-chicago.webserversystems.com (ip-10-204-4-183.us-west-2.compute.internal [10.204.4.183])
by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6DEE1D0669
for
<snipped>; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:53:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|98.139.213.163
Received: from r8-chicago.webserversystems.com (r8-chicago.webserversystems.com [10.253.27.5])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA)
by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.4.3);
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:53:58 GMT
X-MC-Relay: Forwarding
X-MailChannels-SenderId: _forwarded-from|98.139.213.163
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: wwwh
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1422140038457:1831632382
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1422140038456
Received: from nm1-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([98.139.213.163]:59421)
by r8-chicago.webserversystems.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82)
(envelope-from <
[email protected]>)
id 1YF9aV-0009R0-K3
for
<snipped>; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:53:57 -0600
DKIM-Signature:
<snipped>Received: from [98.139.215.142] by nm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2015 22:53:54 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.240] by tm13.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2015 22:53:54 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1049.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2015 22:53:54 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:
[email protected]X-YMail-OSG:
<snipped>Received: by 76.13.26.108; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:53:54 +0000
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:53:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: Khaja Samiuddin <
[email protected]>
Reply-To: Khaja Samiuddin <
[email protected]>
To:
<snipped>Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
References: <
[email protected]> <
[email protected]>
Subject:
Fw: 23/01/2015MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_754166_1832800899.1422140033605"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2
X-Spam-Score: 12
X-Spam-Bar: +
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "r8-chicago.webserversystems.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.
Content preview: On Sunday, January 25, 2015 1:31 AM, Khaja Samiuddin wrote:
This is to inform you that your email address has just won you Eight hundred
thousandUSD (£800,000.00 USD) and a jaguar car in the ongoing Jaguar automobile
Anniversarypromotion draws held today in India, in which e-mail addresses
are selected randomly bycomputerized balloting powered by the Internet.Your
email address was among the lucky few randomly selected for the January batch,only
ten individuals are selected monthly as winners through the electronic ballotingSystem.THE
JAGUAR LOTTERY does not require any application to be a selected winner as
it ispart of our contribution and donation back to the worldwide society
at large.NOTE: TO CLAIM WINNING PRIZE YOU MUST CONTACT THE JAGUAR CLAIMS EMAILADDRESS
WITH THE SPECIFIED INFORMATION BELOW.
Contact Email:
[email protected]1. FULL NAME:
2. ADDRESS:
3. OCCUPATION:
4. SEX:
5. AGE:
6. DIRECT PHONE NO:
7. STATE:
8. COUNTRY:
CONGRATULATIONS!
Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:26 PM, jaguar promo wrote: [...]
Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(khaja_samiuddin89[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[98.139.213.163 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.8 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit
(khaja samiuddin
<khaja_samiuddin89[at]yahoo.com>
)
0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit (khaja_samiuddin89[at]yahoo.com)
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
0.0 T_WON_MONEY_ATTACH You won lots of money! See attachment.
0.0 T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF MS document or PDF attachment, from freemail
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-AuthUser:
