by Reportandie
Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:09 am
Delivered-To: [my.redacted.address]
Received: by 10.182.92.230 with SMTP id cp6csp134501obb;
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.186.143 with SMTP id cs15mr5140761qab.94.1339285736099;
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from smtp2.ithaka.org (smtp2.ithaka.org. [67.220.133.212])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fz9si6132484qab.26.2012.06.09.16.48.55;
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 67.220.133.212 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=67.220.133.212;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 67.220.133.212 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected]
Received: from pr2ucs07.jstor.org ([192.168.52.67])
by NY2Ironport02.ithaka.org with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2012 19:48:55 -0400
Received: from pr2ucs07.jstor.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by pr2ucs07.jstor.org (8.13.8/8.13. with ESMTP id q59NmtTK027384
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:48:55 -0400
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [redacted]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Hello dear,How are you today?.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_22961_476215426.1339285735578"
X-Atypon-Message-ID: ZW1haWw9YnJpYW4uei50LnNtaXRoQGdtYWlsLmNvbSZkYXRlPTA2LTA5LTIwMTImbWlkPTM4NTM1NTEzMw==
JSTOR CITATION LIST
These citations have been sent to you from:
[email protected]
Email note: Hello dear,How are you today?.
I hope you are fine and all is well with you .My dear, I got your contact from dan.tobias.name
as i was browsing looking for a good relationship . I am sorry to bother you with my proposal for a relationship with you , but i know that you will grant my request in good faith and understanding .
My name is Peace, i am an honest , sincere and God fearing lady . I believe that color , religion , language , age , country , tribe , distance etc has nothing to do with real friendship , i believe real friendship is all about love , care , trust etc for each other .
I would like to know more about you , as soon as i receive your mail i will tell you more about myself and send you my pictures .I believe we can move from here . I will be waiting for your mail as soon as possible . Till i hear from you remain blessed and have a happy , wonderful and splendid days ahead .
Cheers ,
Miss Peace.
..................
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
NUMBER OF CITATIONS : 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
Title: The Legitimacy of the People
Author(s): Sofia Näsström
Source: Political Theory, Vol. 35, No. 5 (Oct., 2007), pp. 624-658
Publisher(s): Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20452587
Abstract: In political theory it goes without saying that the constitution of government raises a claim for legitimacy. With the constitution of the people, however, it is different. It is often dismissed as a historical question. The conviction is that since the people cannot decide on its own composition the boundaries of democracy must be determined by other factors, such as the contingent forces of history. This article critically assesses this view. It argues that like the constitution of government, the constitution of the people raises a claim for legitimacy. The failure to see this is what makes many theorists run into the arms of history. They submit the legitimacy of the people to the arbitrary and asymmetrical forces of the present.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
These records have been provided through JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org
).
If you have any questions or need assistance using JSTOR, please contact JSTOR Support (http://www.jstor.org/action/showContactSupportForm
) and let us know how we can help you.
For more information about JSTOR, please visit http://about.jstor.org/
If you need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact JSTOR Support (http://www.jstor.org/action/showContactSupportForm
).
JSTOR Support
[email protected]
(888) 388-3574
JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.
Terms and Conditions (http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
) | Privacy Policy (http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/po ... rivacy.jsp
) | Accessibility (http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/po ... bility.jsp
)
(c)2000-2012 ITHAKA. All Rights Reserved. JSTOR(r), the JSTOR logo, and ITHAKA(r) are registered trademarks of ITHAKA.
Citations.txt Citations.txt
4K View Download
Received: by 10.182.92.230 with SMTP id cp6csp134501obb;
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.186.143 with SMTP id cs15mr5140761qab.94.1339285736099;
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from smtp2.ithaka.org (smtp2.ithaka.org. [67.220.133.212])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fz9si6132484qab.26.2012.06.09.16.48.55;
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 67.220.133.212 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=67.220.133.212;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 67.220.133.212 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected]
Received: from pr2ucs07.jstor.org ([192.168.52.67])
by NY2Ironport02.ithaka.org with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2012 19:48:55 -0400
Received: from pr2ucs07.jstor.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by pr2ucs07.jstor.org (8.13.8/8.13. with ESMTP id q59NmtTK027384
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:48:55 -0400
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [redacted]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Hello dear,How are you today?.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_22961_476215426.1339285735578"
X-Atypon-Message-ID: ZW1haWw9YnJpYW4uei50LnNtaXRoQGdtYWlsLmNvbSZkYXRlPTA2LTA5LTIwMTImbWlkPTM4NTM1NTEzMw==
JSTOR CITATION LIST
These citations have been sent to you from:
[email protected]
Email note: Hello dear,How are you today?.
I hope you are fine and all is well with you .My dear, I got your contact from dan.tobias.name
as i was browsing looking for a good relationship . I am sorry to bother you with my proposal for a relationship with you , but i know that you will grant my request in good faith and understanding .
My name is Peace, i am an honest , sincere and God fearing lady . I believe that color , religion , language , age , country , tribe , distance etc has nothing to do with real friendship , i believe real friendship is all about love , care , trust etc for each other .
I would like to know more about you , as soon as i receive your mail i will tell you more about myself and send you my pictures .I believe we can move from here . I will be waiting for your mail as soon as possible . Till i hear from you remain blessed and have a happy , wonderful and splendid days ahead .
Cheers ,
Miss Peace.
..................
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
NUMBER OF CITATIONS : 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
Title: The Legitimacy of the People
Author(s): Sofia Näsström
Source: Political Theory, Vol. 35, No. 5 (Oct., 2007), pp. 624-658
Publisher(s): Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20452587
Abstract: In political theory it goes without saying that the constitution of government raises a claim for legitimacy. With the constitution of the people, however, it is different. It is often dismissed as a historical question. The conviction is that since the people cannot decide on its own composition the boundaries of democracy must be determined by other factors, such as the contingent forces of history. This article critically assesses this view. It argues that like the constitution of government, the constitution of the people raises a claim for legitimacy. The failure to see this is what makes many theorists run into the arms of history. They submit the legitimacy of the people to the arbitrary and asymmetrical forces of the present.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
These records have been provided through JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org
).
If you have any questions or need assistance using JSTOR, please contact JSTOR Support (http://www.jstor.org/action/showContactSupportForm
) and let us know how we can help you.
For more information about JSTOR, please visit http://about.jstor.org/
If you need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact JSTOR Support (http://www.jstor.org/action/showContactSupportForm
).
JSTOR Support
[email protected]
(888) 388-3574
JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.
Terms and Conditions (http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
) | Privacy Policy (http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/po ... rivacy.jsp
) | Accessibility (http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/po ... bility.jsp
)
(c)2000-2012 ITHAKA. All Rights Reserved. JSTOR(r), the JSTOR logo, and ITHAKA(r) are registered trademarks of ITHAKA.
Citations.txt Citations.txt
4K View Download