Of course your case is hopeless - or that's what they must make you believe.
Clearly they're a bit foggy on
Chapter 501 Part II - Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices
Chapter 501 Part IV - Florida Telemarketing Act - Consumer Protection
Chapter 501.615
http://myconsumeradvocate.com/resources.aspQuoting those statutes at them will make them gulp
not that you're interested in them or their opinion.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/STATUTES/ind ... 6#0501.616I thought I might have to look carefully to find a transgression, but I looked at the first paragraph
Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 501
CONSUMER PROTECTION
View Entire Chapter
501.616 Unlawful acts and practices.--
(1) It shall be unlawful for any commercial telephone seller or salesperson to require that payment be by credit card authorization or otherwise to announce a preference for that method of payment.
That leads to the interesting conclusion that the recording they would seek to use to prove that you willingly gave them your card details (so they say) would also appear to confirm that they did so in contravention of local state law.
Oh bummer.
I haven't looked deeper into this - and this isn't something I've appreciated before, but it looks like a very strong argument to challenge their 'we've got you recorded' argument with your card company.
I'll be out on Wednesday, and I'll give this some thought and perhaps prepare some wording to use with a card company, but if their argument is busted, then so's their whole game.