Looking at the text in the letters themselves:
and your entrance documents has been release to the Immigration Attorney Micheal Ivers
and your entrance documents has been release to the Immigration Attorney Richard Garrido
Note the exact same language (containing errors in grammar that are typical of an African) but two different "attorney" names (and a search online shows no attorneys with either name in UK)! How is it that the writing is exactly the same, word for word? And why do two completely different attorneys have these documents? What is really happening is pretty simple--he is following a script (standard, pre-written letters he sends to many different victims) and just pasting in whatever fake attorney name he is using--either he used the wrong name the first time, or someone complained and had the "attorney" email closed, so he had to change attorney names.
contact him for the courier of your documents to your home country
"home country?" This does not make sense. A father hiring someone to live in his home and care for his children would certainly know what country you are from and would use the name of the country. The real reason it says "home country" is because he is sending this same email to victims in multiple countries, and this language saves him the trouble of trying to remember the individual country each victim is from.
Now lets look at immigration rules:
your entrance documents has been release to the Immigration Attorney Richard Garrido,so you are advise to contact him for the courier of your documents to your home country for you to come over and start your duty.
Here is the form for a UK visa for a domestic worker.
http://www.ukvisas.gov.uk/resources/en/docs/1903073/vaf2The questions on this application must be answered--they are
required to get a UK visa. While there are agencies and firms that will help you with this paperwork for a fee, they are working directly with you to answer the questions and provide the necessary information. The "attorney" who is supposedly getting your visa does not have the information required so how can he be getting the visa for you?
Also note this information taken straight from the UK government's visa information:
All UK visa applicants, save for those benefiting from a limited number of exemptions and exceptions, are required to provide biometric data (10-digit fingerscans and a digital photograph) as part of the application process.
You will have to go to your nearest visa application centre in person to provide your biometrics. In those countries where there is no visa application centre, you will need to go to the British mission.
Your visa application will not be processed until you have provided the necessary biometric information. The finger scans are electronic so staff do not need to use any ink, liquid or chemicals. You will have your digital photograph taken at the same time and the whole procedure should take no more than five minutes to complete.
I personally work for a large international company with a large manufacturing site in UK. The company sends employees to the UK on a daily basis. Even if we are visiting for a day or two, we still have to go to the agency in person to get a visa for this travel. Unless you have a British passport or are a diplomat, There are NO exceptions.
What this means is that the claims this "employer" is making
cannot possibly be true. He cannot get your visa for you. This whole story was designed to get you to pay the phony "affadavit" fee. If you do send him the money, he will then come up with another fee--possibly to ship the "documents" (which really don't exist) to your "home country". He will continue to make up fees as long as you pay, and you will always be just one step away from having everything you need to go work in the UK. Once he has gotten all the money from you that he can, "Mr. Boris," your money, and the "job" will disappear. You won't be able to trace Mr. Boris or the attorney in the UK--because they don't really exist. Your money will be in Africa, where the man behind the emails really is.