by Megan
Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:51 pm
Delivered-To: XXXXXXXXXX
Received: by 10.223.14.75 with SMTP id f11cs107974faa;
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.78.158 with SMTP id l30mr7407393qck.96.1326205443743;
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mail-qy0-f195.google.com (mail-qy0-f195.google.com [209.85.216.195])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h10si27891346qcx.13.2012.01.10.06.24.03
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.195 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=209.85.216.195;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.195 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected]
Received: by qcsd17 with SMTP id d17so401651qcs.6
for XXXXXXXXXX; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.77.134 with SMTP id g6mr7529076qck.125.1326205443027; Tue,
10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.251.212 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [41.211.206.103]
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN_xzSrwcA02-HfV1mZJQ2Yfa9FV9Fj_80_+z0Wzd+ncUDRjXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Thanks for your Reply.
From: office files <[email protected]>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Bcc: XXXXXXXXXX
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235433297e54b57904b62d4495
--00235433297e54b57904b62d4495
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: by 10.223.14.75 with SMTP id f11cs107974faa;
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.78.158 with SMTP id l30mr7407393qck.96.1326205443743;
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mail-qy0-f195.google.com (mail-qy0-f195.google.com [209.85.216.195])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h10si27891346qcx.13.2012.01.10.06.24.03
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.195 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=209.85.216.195;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.195 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected]
Received: by qcsd17 with SMTP id d17so401651qcs.6
for XXXXXXXXXX; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.77.134 with SMTP id g6mr7529076qck.125.1326205443027; Tue,
10 Jan 2012 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.251.212 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [41.211.206.103]
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:24:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN_xzSrwcA02-HfV1mZJQ2Yfa9FV9Fj_80_+z0Wzd+ncUDRjXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Thanks for your Reply.
From: office files <[email protected]>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Bcc: XXXXXXXXXX
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235433297e54b57904b62d4495
--00235433297e54b57904b62d4495
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear.
Firstly, I must solicit your confidence in this transaction, this is by virtue of its nature as being utterly confidential and top secret. Though I know that a transaction of this magnitude will make any one apprehensive and worried, but I am assuring you that all will be fairly processed to conclution. I am Mr. Dennis L. Matthews working with SANCHEZ ASSOCIATE SOLICITORS. I am the personal Attorney to a business mogul, Mr. Alex Hubbert, who managed casinos and restaurants in Spain. He was a foreigner and livedin Spain for many years. Eventually in 2005, my client; his wife and their only child were involved in a car accident along Madrid express-road. All occupants of the vehicle unfortunately lost their lives.
My purpose of contacting you is for you to help secure the funds left behind by my late client, to avoid it being confiscated or declared unserviceable by the Finance House Where this fund valued USD 12,800,000.00(Twelve Million Eight hundred thousand US Dollars)was deposited by my client before his death.
This Finance House has issued me a notice to contact the next of kin or the deposit will be declared unserviceable and the fund diverted to the Government treasury, So far all my efforts to get hold of someone related to my client has proved abortive. Hence, I have contacted you. I am actually asking for your consent to present you to the Finance House as the Next of Kin/beneficiary of my late client's fund, so that the said fund can be paid to your account or in situation whereby you may wish to come to Spain to see the deposited consignment, I will provide all the original documents of deposit that my client left with me.
Any other legal documents required to back up your claim as my client's Next of Kin I shall provide them. All I require is to ascertain your credibility, resourcefulness and coperation to enable us achieve this transaction. I wish to offer you 30% for your efforts when the funds is transferred to your Bank Account . This proposition is entirely risk free. I will use my position as the client’s attorney to guarantee the successful execution of this transaction. If you are interested, please contact me via emails: [email protected]
The intended transaction will be executed under a legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any infraction of the law. However, if this business proposition offends your moral ethics, do accept my sincere apology.
Regards,
Mr. Dennis L. Matthews.