[email protected] Tann Richard

Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 May 2012 15:53:36 -0700
Received: from [125.208.183.200] (port=52476 helo=mail.bjj.co.id)
by with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1SZrlm-0001t4-Ge
for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 15:53:36 -0700
Received: by mail.bjj.co.id (Postfix, from userid 100)
id 81BDF1B8965A; Thu, 31 May 2012 00:40:16 +0700 (WIT)
Received: from mail.bjj.co.id (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.bjj.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E9D1B892A2;
Thu, 31 May 2012 00:40:14 +0700 (WIT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.bjj.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C3817ED5B5;
Thu, 31 May 2012 00:40:06 +0700 (WIT)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.579
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.579 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[AWL=0.031,
BAYES_20=-0.74, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.bjj.co.id ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.bjj.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ao7dDHmpU5CF; Thu, 31 May 2012 00:40:04 +0700 (WIT)
Received: from mail.bjj.co.id (mail.bjj.co.id [172.16.200.100])
by mail.bjj.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BA917EAE17;
Thu, 31 May 2012 00:39:52 +0700 (WIT)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:39:52 +0700 (WIT)
From: Tann R <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Tann Richard <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [74.82.203.170]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0
X-Spam-Score: 70
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview: I am an auditor with the RHB Bank Singapore. I make contact
with you privately to reconcile an estate /claims believe to have strong
link to you as the beneficiary due to my investigation. Please reply as soon
as possible for me to unite you with the estate/claims. [...]

Content analysis details: (7.0 points, 7.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[125.208.183.200 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
[125.208.183.200 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
-0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
[score: 0.0885]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Are you aware of this information?





I am an auditor with the RHB Bank Singapore. I make contact with you privately to reconcile an estate /claims believe to have strong link to you as the beneficiary due to my investigation.

Please reply as soon as possible for me to unite you with the estate/claims.

Yours truly,
Richard Tann