by Reportandie
Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:20 pm
Delivered-To: [my.redacted.address]
Received: by 10.64.102.226 with SMTP id fr2csp368896ieb;
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.29.194 with SMTP id m2mr27746176qeh.61.1349466196642;
Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from oms-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (oms-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com. [205.188.167.68])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn4si7922060qab.52.2012.10.05.12.43.16;
Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 205.188.167.68 as permitted sender) client-ip5.188.167.68;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 205.188.167.68 as permitted sender) [email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Received: from mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.139])
by oms-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (AOL Outbound OMS Interface) with ESMTP id 5AA0D380000D9
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from core-mhe003b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mhe003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.239.131])
by mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 21432E00008E
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
References: <[email protected]> <CAJShTS0raH8c5YszVp4GEmcZP3zBX2Gtsb_+VyJGeNxRq0e6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: [redacted]
Subject: Re:Greetings To You,
In-Reply-To: <CAJShTS0raH8c5YszVp4GEmcZP3zBX2Gtsb_+VyJGeNxRq0e6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: [email protected]
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--------MB_8CF7148CC112072_A48_FB15_webmail-m013.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37058-STANDARD
Received: from 41.151.223.149 by webmail-m013.sysops.aol.com (64.12.101.97) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:43:15 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Originating-IP: [41.151.223.149]
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:43:15 -0400 (EDT)
x-aol-global-disposition: S
X-SPAM-FLAG: YES
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com;
s110426; t=1349466196;
bh=MJTplkb4VNyW5zQhMeuDoCfWR0YRTqUtJLRjD0Lx/Kk=;
h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=d5wTvh+x6n3y3lQI9lbASpn42rBKaXsDqckYDcvjYvMv2Dt0aeSJO3/n05yxO9B0E
ahFScHUBHpHqH0cizCmc2ADRrYPq0LB40CqlXxjxqSQCSc1xm3Yv/puQuCcUg0PCJs
cChdorUcTHZn+Sd3dPEAIKAssiSDAoXc0GMcwkX8X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:5:79347776:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
X-AOL-REROUTE: YES
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338b506f38547f39
Steven Walker(Esq)
Village Arcade Station Road
London E4 7DA, United Kingdom.
Email: [email protected]
Greetings To You,
This is a personal email directed to you and I request that it be treated as such. I am Steven Walker, a personal attorney/sole executor to the late Engineer Robert M, hereinafter referred to as” my client" I represent the interest of my client killed with his immediate family in a fatal motor accident in East London on November 5, 2002.and I will like to negotiate the terms of investment of resources available to him.
My late client worked as consulting engineer & sub-comptroller with Genesis Oil and Gas Consultants Ltd here in the United Kingdom and had left behind a deposit of Six Million Eight Hundred Thousand British Pounds Sterling only (£6.8million) with a finance company. The funds originated from contract transactions he executed in his registered area of business. Just after his death, I was contacted by the finance house to provide his next of kin, reasons been that his deposit agreement contains a residuary clause giving his personal attorney express authority to nominate the beneficiary to his funds. Unknown to the bank, Robert had left no possible trace of any of his close relative with me, making all efforts in my part to locate his family relative to be unfruitful since his death. In addition, from Robert’s own story, he was only adopted and his foster parents whom he lost in 1976, according to him had no possible trace of his real family.
The funds had remained unclaimed since his death, but I had made effort writing several letters to the embassy with intent to locate any of his extended relatives whom shall be claimants/beneficiaries of his abandoned personal estate, and all such efforts have been to no avail. More so, I have received official letters in the last few weeks suggesting a likely proceeding for confiscation of his abandoned personal assets in line with existing laws by the bank However, it will interest you to know that I discovered that some directors of this finance company are making plans already to have this fund to themselves only to use the excuse that since I am unable to find a next of kin to my late client then the funds should be confiscated, meanwhile their intentions is to have the funds retrieved for themselves.
I reasoned very professionally and resolved to use a legal means to retrieve the abandoned funds, and that is to present the next of kin of my deceased client to the bank. This is legally possible and would be done in accordance with the laws. On this note, I decided to search for a credible person and finding that you bear a similar last name, I was urged to contact you, that I may, with your consent, present you to the "trustee" bank as my late client's surviving family member so as to enable you put up a claim to the bank in that capacity as a next of kin of my client. I find this to be possible for the fuller reasons that you are of the same nationality and you bear a similar last name with my late client making it a lot easier for you to put up a claim in that capacity. I have all vital documents that would confer you the legal right to lay claim to the funds, and it would back up your claim. I am willing to make these documents available to you so that the proceeds of this bank account valued at £6.8million can be paid to you before it is confiscated or declared unserviceable to the bank where this huge amount is lodged.
I do sincerely sympathize the death of my client but I think that it is unprofitable for his funds to be submitted to the government of this country or some financial institution. I seek your assistance since I have been unable to locate the relatives for the past three years now and since no one would come for the claim. I seek your consent to present you as the next of kin of the deceased since you have the same last name giving you the advantage which also makes the claim most credible . In that stand, the proceeds of this account can be paid to you. Then, we talk about percentage. I know there are others with the same surname as my client, but after a little search, my instinct tells me to contact you. I shall assemble all the necessary documents that would be used to back up your claim.
I guarantee that this will be executed under a legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of law. I will not fail to bring to your notice that this proposal is hitch-free and that you should not entertain any fears as the required arrangements have been made for the completion of this transfer. As I said, I require only a solemn confidentiality on this. Please get in touch via my alternative email ([email protected] ) for better confidentiality and if it’s okay to you send me your telephone and fax numbers to enable us discuss further on this transaction, please do not take undue advantage of the trust I have bestowed in you, Thanks for your understanding.
Kind Regards.
Steven Walker
Received: by 10.64.102.226 with SMTP id fr2csp368896ieb;
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.29.194 with SMTP id m2mr27746176qeh.61.1349466196642;
Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from oms-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (oms-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com. [205.188.167.68])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn4si7922060qab.52.2012.10.05.12.43.16;
Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 205.188.167.68 as permitted sender) client-ip5.188.167.68;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 205.188.167.68 as permitted sender) [email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Received: from mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.139])
by oms-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (AOL Outbound OMS Interface) with ESMTP id 5AA0D380000D9
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from core-mhe003b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mhe003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.239.131])
by mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 21432E00008E
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
References: <[email protected]> <CAJShTS0raH8c5YszVp4GEmcZP3zBX2Gtsb_+VyJGeNxRq0e6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: [redacted]
Subject: Re:Greetings To You,
In-Reply-To: <CAJShTS0raH8c5YszVp4GEmcZP3zBX2Gtsb_+VyJGeNxRq0e6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: [email protected]
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--------MB_8CF7148CC112072_A48_FB15_webmail-m013.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37058-STANDARD
Received: from 41.151.223.149 by webmail-m013.sysops.aol.com (64.12.101.97) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:43:15 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Originating-IP: [41.151.223.149]
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:43:15 -0400 (EDT)
x-aol-global-disposition: S
X-SPAM-FLAG: YES
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com;
s110426; t=1349466196;
bh=MJTplkb4VNyW5zQhMeuDoCfWR0YRTqUtJLRjD0Lx/Kk=;
h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=d5wTvh+x6n3y3lQI9lbASpn42rBKaXsDqckYDcvjYvMv2Dt0aeSJO3/n05yxO9B0E
ahFScHUBHpHqH0cizCmc2ADRrYPq0LB40CqlXxjxqSQCSc1xm3Yv/puQuCcUg0PCJs
cChdorUcTHZn+Sd3dPEAIKAssiSDAoXc0GMcwkX8X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:5:79347776:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
X-AOL-REROUTE: YES
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338b506f38547f39
Steven Walker(Esq)
Village Arcade Station Road
London E4 7DA, United Kingdom.
Email: [email protected]
Greetings To You,
This is a personal email directed to you and I request that it be treated as such. I am Steven Walker, a personal attorney/sole executor to the late Engineer Robert M, hereinafter referred to as” my client" I represent the interest of my client killed with his immediate family in a fatal motor accident in East London on November 5, 2002.and I will like to negotiate the terms of investment of resources available to him.
My late client worked as consulting engineer & sub-comptroller with Genesis Oil and Gas Consultants Ltd here in the United Kingdom and had left behind a deposit of Six Million Eight Hundred Thousand British Pounds Sterling only (£6.8million) with a finance company. The funds originated from contract transactions he executed in his registered area of business. Just after his death, I was contacted by the finance house to provide his next of kin, reasons been that his deposit agreement contains a residuary clause giving his personal attorney express authority to nominate the beneficiary to his funds. Unknown to the bank, Robert had left no possible trace of any of his close relative with me, making all efforts in my part to locate his family relative to be unfruitful since his death. In addition, from Robert’s own story, he was only adopted and his foster parents whom he lost in 1976, according to him had no possible trace of his real family.
The funds had remained unclaimed since his death, but I had made effort writing several letters to the embassy with intent to locate any of his extended relatives whom shall be claimants/beneficiaries of his abandoned personal estate, and all such efforts have been to no avail. More so, I have received official letters in the last few weeks suggesting a likely proceeding for confiscation of his abandoned personal assets in line with existing laws by the bank However, it will interest you to know that I discovered that some directors of this finance company are making plans already to have this fund to themselves only to use the excuse that since I am unable to find a next of kin to my late client then the funds should be confiscated, meanwhile their intentions is to have the funds retrieved for themselves.
I reasoned very professionally and resolved to use a legal means to retrieve the abandoned funds, and that is to present the next of kin of my deceased client to the bank. This is legally possible and would be done in accordance with the laws. On this note, I decided to search for a credible person and finding that you bear a similar last name, I was urged to contact you, that I may, with your consent, present you to the "trustee" bank as my late client's surviving family member so as to enable you put up a claim to the bank in that capacity as a next of kin of my client. I find this to be possible for the fuller reasons that you are of the same nationality and you bear a similar last name with my late client making it a lot easier for you to put up a claim in that capacity. I have all vital documents that would confer you the legal right to lay claim to the funds, and it would back up your claim. I am willing to make these documents available to you so that the proceeds of this bank account valued at £6.8million can be paid to you before it is confiscated or declared unserviceable to the bank where this huge amount is lodged.
I do sincerely sympathize the death of my client but I think that it is unprofitable for his funds to be submitted to the government of this country or some financial institution. I seek your assistance since I have been unable to locate the relatives for the past three years now and since no one would come for the claim. I seek your consent to present you as the next of kin of the deceased since you have the same last name giving you the advantage which also makes the claim most credible . In that stand, the proceeds of this account can be paid to you. Then, we talk about percentage. I know there are others with the same surname as my client, but after a little search, my instinct tells me to contact you. I shall assemble all the necessary documents that would be used to back up your claim.
I guarantee that this will be executed under a legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of law. I will not fail to bring to your notice that this proposal is hitch-free and that you should not entertain any fears as the required arrangements have been made for the completion of this transfer. As I said, I require only a solemn confidentiality on this. Please get in touch via my alternative email ([email protected] ) for better confidentiality and if it’s okay to you send me your telephone and fax numbers to enable us discuss further on this transaction, please do not take undue advantage of the trust I have bestowed in you, Thanks for your understanding.
Kind Regards.
Steven Walker