by Reportandie
Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:49 pm
Delivered-To: [my.redacted.address]
Received: by 10.76.141.230 with SMTP id rr6csp285455oab;
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.42.170 with SMTP id p10mr8631891igl.47.1353378038162;
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from ns1.servernap.net ([69.65.48.120])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5si10804273ick.99.2012.11.19.18.12.05
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: fail (google.com: domain of [email protected] does not designate 69.65.48.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.65.48.120;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=hardfail (google.com: domain of [email protected] does not designate 69.65.48.120 as permitted sender) [email protected]
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:46076 helo=localhost)
by ip-69.65.48.120.servernap.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1TaaYQ-0007vd-30; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:15:02 -0500
Received: from 193.243.171.248 ([193.243.171.248]) by 69.65.48.120 (Horde
Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:14:47 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:14:47 -0500
From: "Relation Tracking Ltd." <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
To: [redacted]
Subject: ESSENCE OF COMMUNICATION
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1;
DelSp="Yes";
format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.11)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns1.servernap.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gmail.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - aol.co.uk
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ns1.servernap.net: authenticated_id: [email protected]
--
Relations Tracking Ltd,
My name is Mrs Sandra Watson ,I work with the Relations Tracking Ltd, a consulting Firm in London, UK. We are conducting a standard process investigation involving a client who shares the same name with you and also the circumstances surrounding investments made by this client at HSBC Bank Plc.
The HSBC Private Banking client died intestate and nominated no next of kin to inherit the title over the investments made with HSBC Bank Plc. The essence of this communication with you is to request that you provide us information on three issues:
1-Are you aware of any relative/relation having the same surname, whose last known contact address was Madrid, Spain?
2-Are you aware of any investment of considerable value made by such a person at the HSBC Bank Plc.?
3-Can you establish beyond reasonable doubt your eligibility to assume status of next of kin to the deceased?
It is pertinent that you inform us ASAP whether or not you are familiar with this personality that we may put an end to this communication with you and our inquiries surrounding this personality.
You must appreciate that we are constrained from providing you with more detailed information at this point. PLEASE RESPOND BACK TO MY PRIVATE AND
DIRECT EMAIL ADDRESS; ([email protected]) as soon as possible to afford us the opportunity to close this investigation.
Thank you for accommodating our enquiry.
Yours sincerely,
Mrs. Sandra Watson.
Received: by 10.76.141.230 with SMTP id rr6csp285455oab;
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.42.170 with SMTP id p10mr8631891igl.47.1353378038162;
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from ns1.servernap.net ([69.65.48.120])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5si10804273ick.99.2012.11.19.18.12.05
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: fail (google.com: domain of [email protected] does not designate 69.65.48.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.65.48.120;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=hardfail (google.com: domain of [email protected] does not designate 69.65.48.120 as permitted sender) [email protected]
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:46076 helo=localhost)
by ip-69.65.48.120.servernap.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1TaaYQ-0007vd-30; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:15:02 -0500
Received: from 193.243.171.248 ([193.243.171.248]) by 69.65.48.120 (Horde
Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:14:47 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:14:47 -0500
From: "Relation Tracking Ltd." <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
To: [redacted]
Subject: ESSENCE OF COMMUNICATION
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1;
DelSp="Yes";
format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.11)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns1.servernap.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gmail.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - aol.co.uk
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ns1.servernap.net: authenticated_id: [email protected]
--
Relations Tracking Ltd,
My name is Mrs Sandra Watson ,I work with the Relations Tracking Ltd, a consulting Firm in London, UK. We are conducting a standard process investigation involving a client who shares the same name with you and also the circumstances surrounding investments made by this client at HSBC Bank Plc.
The HSBC Private Banking client died intestate and nominated no next of kin to inherit the title over the investments made with HSBC Bank Plc. The essence of this communication with you is to request that you provide us information on three issues:
1-Are you aware of any relative/relation having the same surname, whose last known contact address was Madrid, Spain?
2-Are you aware of any investment of considerable value made by such a person at the HSBC Bank Plc.?
3-Can you establish beyond reasonable doubt your eligibility to assume status of next of kin to the deceased?
It is pertinent that you inform us ASAP whether or not you are familiar with this personality that we may put an end to this communication with you and our inquiries surrounding this personality.
You must appreciate that we are constrained from providing you with more detailed information at this point. PLEASE RESPOND BACK TO MY PRIVATE AND
DIRECT EMAIL ADDRESS; ([email protected]) as soon as possible to afford us the opportunity to close this investigation.
Thank you for accommodating our enquiry.
Yours sincerely,
Mrs. Sandra Watson.