[email protected]

Delivered-To: [my.redacted.address]
Received: by 10.58.69.116 with SMTP id d20csp1105383veu;
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:08:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.216.133 with SMTP id oq5mr1833955igc.64.1354298883915;
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mailgate.nida.ac.th ([202.44.72.13])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cf7si5616701icc.59.2012.11.30.10.08.02;
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 202.44.72.13 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip2.44.72.13;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 202.44.72.13 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected]
Received: from pps.filterd (mailgate [127.0.0.1])
by mailgate.nida.ac.th (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qAUI6bhq018164
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 01:08:00 +0700
Received: from nida.nida.ac.th (mail.nida.ac.th [202.44.72.1])
by mailgate.nida.ac.th with ESMTP id 18xdr81jn2-1
for <[my.redacted.address]>; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:08:00 +0700
Received: (qmail 17981 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2012 17:44:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.nida.ac.th) ([127.0.0.1])
(envelope-sender <[email protected]>)
by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <redacted>; 30 Nov 2012 17:44:26 -0000
Received: from 96.44.189.211
(SquirrelMail authenticated user nittaya)
by mail.nida.ac.th with HTTP;
Sat, 1 Dec 2012 00:44:26 +0700 (ICT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 00:44:26 +0700 (ICT)
Subject: Message
From: "Richard Fisher" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8185,1.0.431,0.0.0000
definitions12-11-30_15:2012-11-30,2012-11-30,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe

Dear Friend,

I wish to intimate you with a request that would be of immense benefit to
both of us. Being an executor of WILL, it is possible that we may be
tempted to make fortune out of our client situation, when we cannot help
it, or left with no better option. The issue I am presenting to you is
about my client who WILLED a fortune to his next-of-kin. It was most
unfortunate that he and his next-of-kin died on the same day in the sharja
plane crash of Tuesday 10 February 2004.I am now faced with confusion of
who to pass the fortune to. According to the English law, the fortune is
supposed to be bequeathed to the government.

However don’t belong to that school of thought which proposes that the
fortune of unlucky people be given to the government. I seek your
assistance to act as the beneficiary of the inheritance, and lay claim to
the legacy (12.4Million Pounds Sterling), which this my unfortunate client
bequeathed to his next-of-kin. For now, It is only known to me, as my
client has great confident in me. Everything will be left between you and
I. The share would be 40% for you and 60% for me. All I have to do is to
amend the WILL stating you as the beneficiary to the 12.4Million pounds
sterling.

I prefer not to divulge my full identity so as not to risk being debarred.
The English Bar considers it a breach of the oath of the English Bar
Council. I need not emphasize to you that the sensitivity of this issue
need not be toyed with by neglecting its confidentiality. At this point I
want to assure you that your true consent, full cooperation and
confidentiality are all that are required for us to take full advantage of
this great opportunity. This is an opportunity that people rarely have; I
look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours Truly.
Barrister Richard Fisher
[email protected]