by buried under 419s
Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:04 am
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:50:11 -0700
Received: from s48.n56.n84.n66.static.myhostcenter.com ([66.84.56.48]:34020 helo=beatscape.net)
by with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1UUXzL-0008Kg-W3
for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:50:10 -0700
Received: from [95.110.177.110] (host110-177-110-95.serverdedicati.aruba.it [95.110.177.110] (may be forged))
(authenticated bits=0)
by beatscape.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r3N7kEq3010341;
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:47:41 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Orig: host110-177-110-95.serverdedicati.aruba.it [95.110.177.110] (may be forged)
X-Authentication-Warning: beatscape.net: beatscap owned process doing -bs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
Subject: Hi
To: Beneficiary <[email protected]>
From: "Rachel" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:47:28 +0200
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.4
X-Spam-Score: 54
X-Spam-Bar: +++++
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Do make contact with me to reconcile your claim. Regards,
Rachel [...]
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(rtannnm[at]aol.com)
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
[66.84.56.48 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?66.84.56.48>]
0.8 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5577]
1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
freemails
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Do make contact with me to reconcile your claim. Regards, Rachel
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:50:11 -0700
Received: from s48.n56.n84.n66.static.myhostcenter.com ([66.84.56.48]:34020 helo=beatscape.net)
by with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1UUXzL-0008Kg-W3
for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:50:10 -0700
Received: from [95.110.177.110] (host110-177-110-95.serverdedicati.aruba.it [95.110.177.110] (may be forged))
(authenticated bits=0)
by beatscape.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r3N7kEq3010341;
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:47:41 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Orig: host110-177-110-95.serverdedicati.aruba.it [95.110.177.110] (may be forged)
X-Authentication-Warning: beatscape.net: beatscap owned process doing -bs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
Subject: Hi
To: Beneficiary <[email protected]>
From: "Rachel" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:47:28 +0200
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.4
X-Spam-Score: 54
X-Spam-Bar: +++++
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Do make contact with me to reconcile your claim. Regards,
Rachel [...]
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(rtannnm[at]aol.com)
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
[66.84.56.48 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?66.84.56.48>]
0.8 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5577]
1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
freemails
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Do make contact with me to reconcile your claim. Regards, Rachel
Questions about scams? fraudatiocruor @ gmail.com to contact remove spaces