[email protected] TASIA

Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:36:55 -0800
Received: from [37.221.135.162] (port=59476 helo=kevinbruce.com)
by with smtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1YQftF-0007lZ-GQ
for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:36:55 -0800
Received: from mtu23.bigping.com [197.50.129.84] by smtp.endend.nl with QMQP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:26:44 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:26:44 -0600
Reply-To: "TASIA" <[email protected]>
From: "TASIA" <[email protected]>
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <>
Subject: Sup?
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.9
X-Spam-Score: 59
X-Spam-Bar: +++++
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview: Email me at [email protected] It's urgent [...]

Content analysis details: (5.9 points, 7.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[37.221.135.162 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?37.221.135.162>]
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.7 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail)
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.9496]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Spam-Flag: NO

Email me at [email protected]
It's urgent